Why Developmental Science? The Case for an Integrative Science of Human Becoming

Further Reading

Works for further study on the themes of this article.

1. Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611-626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611
2. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
3. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. In Handbook of Child Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
4. Cairns, R. B. (1992). The making of a developmental science: The contributions and intellectual heritage of James Mark Baldwin. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.17
5. Gottlieb, G. (2005). Probabilistic epigenesis of development. In Handbook of Developmental Psychology (pp. 3-17). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608306.n1
6. Magnusson, D., & Cairns, R. B. (1996). Developmental science: Toward a unified framework. In Developmental Science (pp. 7-30). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571114.003
7. Overton, W. F. (2013). A new paradigm for developmental science: Relationism and relational-developmental systems. Applied Developmental Science, 17(2), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2013.778717
8. Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Development, 81(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01378.x